Pressure Pumping Market to Reach $224.27 billion with 16.66% CAGR Forecast to 2022

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Pressure Pumping -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database

PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — Pressure Pumping Industry

Description

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Pressure pumping Market is valued at $76.23 billion in 2015 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 16.66% to reach $224.27 billion by 2022. Rising energy demand across the globe, growing drilling activities for extraction of oil and gas are some of the major factors fueling the market growth. Moreover, shift towards oil drilling activities by exploration and production companies due to declining natural gas prices is anticipated to propel the market growth. On the other hand, huge installation costs and stringent government regulations for the usage of of these systems are expected to hamper market in upcoming years.

Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/562696-pressure-pumping-global-market-outlook-2015-2022

Hydraulic fracturing held the largest market share. However, cementing services is anticipated to witness strong growth over the forecast period. North America commanded the global market owing to the presence of large count of oil field service industries in the region. Market is highly concentrated with top five companies occupying the major market share. Existing market players have good access in the market and entry of new players into the market is very difficult.

Some of the key players in global Pressure pumping market are

Baker Hughes , Calfrac Well Services Ltd., China Oilfield Services , Diamond Offshore Drilling, Inc., Frac Tech Services International, Halliburton, Key Energy Services, Nabors Industries Ltd., , National Oilwell Varco, Pioneer Energy Services, RPC Inc., Sanjel Corporation, Schlumberger, Superior Energy Services, Inc., Trican, Weatherford International Inc., and National Drilling Company .

Leave a Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/562696-pressure-pumping-global-market-outlook-2015-2022

Type of services Covered:
• Cementing Services
o Remedial cementing
o Primary cementing

Hydraulic Fracturing
Other Services
o Acidization
o Sand controlling services

Type of Resources Covered:
• Unconventional
• Conventional

Type of Wells Covered
• Vertical
• Horizontal
Regions Covered:
• North America
o US
o Canada
o Mexico
• Europe
o Germany
o France
o Italy
o UK
o Spain
o Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
o Japan
o China
o India
o Australia
o New Zealand
o Rest of Asia Pacific
• Rest of the World
o Middle East
o Brazil
o Argentina
o South Africa
o Egypt

What our report offers:
– Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments
– Market share analysis of the top industry players
– Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
– Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets
– Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
– Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
– Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
– Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
– Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Buy now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=562696

Table of Content

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface
2.1 Abstract
2.2 Stake Holders
2.3 Research Scope
2.4 Research Methodology
2.4.1 Data Mining
2.4.2 Data Analysis
2.4.3 Data Validation
2.4.4 Research Approach
2.5 Research Sources
2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Drivers
3.3 Restraints
3.4 Opportunities
3.5 Threats
3.6 Product Analysis
3.7 Emerging Markets

4 Porters Five Force Analysis
4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
4.3 Threat of substitutes
4.4 Threat of new entrants
4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Pressure Pumping Market, By Service Type
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Cementing Services
5.2.1 Remedial cementing
5.2.2 Primary cementing
5.3 Hydraulic Fracturing
5.4 Other Services
5.4.1 Acidization
5.4.2 Sand controlling services

6 Global Pressure Pumping Market, By Resource Type
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Unconventional
6.3 Conventional

7 Global Pressure Pumping Market, By Well Type
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Vertical
7.3 Horizontal

Continued…

Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.Com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (US) Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (UK)

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Global Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2021

This report studies Healthcare RCM Outsourcing in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India

PUNE, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ —

Summary

This report studies Healthcare RCM Outsourcing in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with Production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering

Conifer Health Solutions
Emdeon Business Services
MedAssets
Parallon Business Solutions
The SSI Group

Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/714827-global-healthcare-rcm-outsourcing-market-research-report-2016

Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Healthcare RCM Outsourcing in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Southeast Asia
India

Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into
Type I
Type II
Type III

Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Healthcare RCM Outsourcing in each application, can be divided into
Application 1
Application 2
Application 3

At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/714827-global-healthcare-rcm-outsourcing-market-research-report-2016

Table of Contents

Global Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Market Research Report 2016
1 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Healthcare RCM Outsourcing
1.2 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Healthcare RCM Outsourcing by Type in 2015
1.2.2 Type I
1.2.3 Type II
1.2.4 Type III
1.3 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Segment by Application
1.3.1 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015
1.3.2 Application 1
1.3.3 Application 2
1.3.4 Application 3
1.4 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Market by Region
1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Healthcare RCM Outsourcing (2011-2021)

2 Global Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.2 Global Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.3 Global Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.4 Manufacturers Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type
2.5 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.5.1 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Market Concentration Rate
2.5.2 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers
2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion

7 Global Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis
7.1 Conifer Health Solutions
7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.1.2 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Product Type, Application and Specification
7.1.2.1 Type I
7.1.2.2 Type II
7.1.3 Conifer Health Solutions Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.2 Emdeon Business Services
7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.2.2 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Product Type, Application and Specification
7.2.2.1 Type I
7.2.2.2 Type II
7.2.3 Emdeon Business Services Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.3 MedAssets
7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.3.2 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Product Type, Application and Specification
7.3.2.1 Type I
7.3.2.2 Type II
7.3.3 MedAssets Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.4 Parallon Business Solutions
7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.4.2 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Product Type, Application and Specification
7.4.2.1 Type I
7.4.2.2 Type II
7.4.3 Parallon Business Solutions Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.5 The SSI Group
7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.5.2 Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Product Type, Application and Specification
7.5.2.1 Type I
7.5.2.2 Type II
7.5.3 The SSI Group Healthcare RCM Outsourcing Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview

…..Continued

Buy Now This Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=714827

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Solid Control Equipment Market to Reach $3.92 billion with 11.41% CAGR Forecast to 2022

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Solid Control Equipment -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database

PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — Solid Control Equipment Industry

Description

According to Stratistics MRC, the Global Solid control equipment Market is valued at $1.84 billion in 2015 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 11.41% to reach $3.92 billion by 2022. The rising demand for energy and increasing environmental concerns are the key factors driving the solids control equipment market growth. However adverse weather conditions pose a major challenge for the vendors in the market. Innovation of new products provides ample of opportunities for the players in the market to expand their business.

Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/562695-solid-control-equipment-global-market-outlook-2015-2022

North America is the leading market owing to the technological advancements that has made the companies to lessen the fluid losses at a larger extent. Approximately 50% of the global oil and gas reserves are present in North America, mainly in U.S., which has augmented the drilling activities in the region. On the other hand, Europe is anticipated to witness a relatively sluggish growth owing to political and economic uncertainty. Contracts and agreements are the key strategies adopted by the players to gain traction in the market.

Some of the key players in global Solid control equipment market are

Aker Solutions, Baker Hughes Inc., Clean Harbors, Inc., Derrick Equipment Company, Geographic Revenue Mix, GN Solids Control, Halliburton Company, Imdex Limited, Kemtron Technologies, Inc., Kosun Machinery Co., Ltd., National Oilwell Varco, Inc., Schlumberger Ltd., SCOMI Group BHD, Secure Energy Services, Inc., and Weatherford International Ltd.

Leave a Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/562695-solid-control-equipment-global-market-outlook-2015-2022

Products Covered:
• Hydrocyclones
• Shale Shakers & Screens
• MUD Cleaner
• MUD Centrifuges
• Other Solids Control Equipment

Applications Covered:
• Offshore Solids Control Equipment
• Onshore Solids Control Equipment

Regions Covered:
• North America
o US
o Canada
o Mexico
• Europe
o Germany
o France
o Italy
o UK
o Spain
o Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
o Japan
o China
o India
o Australia
o New Zealand
o Rest of Asia Pacific
• Rest of the World
o Middle East
o Brazil
o Argentina
o South Africa
o Egypt

What our report offers:
– Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments
– Market share analysis of the top industry players
– Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
– Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets
– Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
– Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
– Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
– Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
– Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Buy now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=562695

Table of Content

1 Executive Summary

2 Preface
2.1 Abstract
2.2 Stake Holders
2.3 Research Scope
2.4 Research Methodology
2.4.1 Data Mining
2.4.2 Data Analysis
2.4.3 Data Validation
2.4.4 Research Approach
2.5 Research Sources
2.5.1 Primary Research Sources
2.5.2 Secondary Research Sources
2.5.3 Assumptions

3 Market Trend Analysis
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Drivers
3.3 Restraints
3.4 Opportunities
3.5 Threats
3.6 Product Analysis
3.7 Application Analysis
3.8 Emerging Markets

4 Porters Five Force Analysis
4.1 Bargaining power of suppliers
4.2 Bargaining power of buyers
4.3 Threat of substitutes
4.4 Threat of new entrants
4.5 Competitive rivalry

5 Global Solid control equipment Market, By Product
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Hydrocyclones
5.3 Shale Shakers & Screens
5.4 MUD Cleaner
5.5 MUD Centrifuges
5.6 Other Solids Control Equipment

6 Global Solid control equipment Market, By Application
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Offshore Solids Control Equipment
6.3 Onshore Solids Control Equipment

Continued…

Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.Com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (US) Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (UK)

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Wearable Technology Market to Reach $37.39 billion with 18.4% CAGR Forecast to 2022

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “Wearable Technology -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database

PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — Wearable Technology Industry

Description

According to Stratistics MRC, the Wearable technology market accounted for $11.43 billion in 2015 and is expected to grow at a CAGR of 18.4% to reach $37.39 billion by 2022. The factors such as increasing awareness of technologies in smartphone and internet applications, wide applications in healthcare and sensor technologies, growing recognition for wearable fitness & medical devices, emerging urban lifestyle and growing advancements in technologies are some of the factors driving the market growth. However, high power consumption, low battery life, huge initial cost are some of the factors restraining the market. Furthermore, increasing adoption of wearable technology in several applications is one of the biggest opportunities for the market growth over the forecast period.

Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/562720-wearable-technology-global-market-outlook-2015-2022

By Application, Enterprise & industrial segment is expected to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period owing to its rising demand for wearable computing devices and scanners. North America accounted for the largest share however, Asia Pacific is estimated to grow at the highest CAGR during the forecast period, attributed to factors such as rising health awareness, new innovations and advancements in technology and product usage.

Some of the key players in global ceramic coating market include

Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. Xiaomi Technology Co. Ltd., Apple Inc., Qualcomm Inc., Fitbit Inc., 270 Vision, ARA (Applied Research Associates), Acer, 3L Labs, Sony Corp., Abbot Laboratories, Basis (Basis Science), Garmin Ltd. , Pebble Technology Corp., LG Electronics Inc., and Google Inc.

Technologies Covered:
• Networking Technologies (Bluetooth,RFID, NFC, ANT+, and Wi-Fi)
• Speech Recognition Technologies
• Computing Technologies (Wearable Computers)
• Sensor Technologies (Accelerometers and Mems)
• Display Technlogies (HUD, HMD, and Augmented Reality)
• Positioning Technologies (Gps and Digital Compass)
• Lowed Powered Wireless SoC Technologies
• Energy Harvesting Technologies
• Ergonomics & Materials Science Technologies

Leave a Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/562720-wearable-technology-global-market-outlook-2015-2022

Products Covered:
• Neckwear
o Ties and Collars
o Fashion and Jewellery
• Eyewear
o Contact Lenses and Other (HMD, HUD, Augmented) Displays
o Smart Glasses and Goggles
• Wrist wear
o Wrist Bands
o Wrist Wear Computers and Watches
• Footwear
o Special Purpose Footwear
o Casual Footwear

Body wear
o Fashion & Apparel
o Arm & Legwear
o Clothing and Inner Wear
• Head worn devices
o Smart caps
o Smart headsets
o Fit guards
o Head Bands
• Other wearable technologies
o Ring Scanners

Applications Covered:
• Healthcare
o Non-Clinical Applications
o Clinical Applications
• Enterprise & Industrial Applications
o Logistics, Packaging, & Warehouse Applications
o Other Industrial Applications
o Other Applications
• Consumer Electronics
o Multi-Function Applications
o Fitness & Sports Applications
o Garments & Fashion Applications
o Infotainment & Multimedia Applications
• Other Applications

Components Covered:
• Control Components
• Power Supply Components
• Sensing Components
• Positioning and Networking Components
• Interface Components
• Display & Optoelectronic Components
• Memory Components
• Other Components

Smart Textile Covered:
• Smart Wearable Functions
o Luminescence & Aesthetics
o Sensing
o Energy Harvesting
o Thermo-Electricity
o Power generation or storage
o Radio frequency functioning
o Sensing
o Other Functions
• Smart Textile Type
o Ultra-Smart Textiles
o Passive Smart Textiles
o Active Smart Textiles
• Smart Technology
o Printing conductive inks
o Weaving or knitting
o Disposition of conductive polymers
• Other Smart Textiles

Buy now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=562720

Regions Covered:
• North America
o US
o Canada
o Mexico
• Europe
o Germany
o France
o Italy
o UK
o Spain
o Rest of Europe
• Asia Pacific
o Japan
o China
o India
o Australia
o New Zealand
o Rest of Asia Pacific
• Rest of the World
o Middle East
o Brazil
o Argentina
o South Africa
o Egypt

What our report offers:
– Market share assessments for the regional and country level segments
– Market share analysis of the top industry players
– Strategic recommendations for the new entrants
– Market forecasts for a minimum of 7 years of all the mentioned segments, sub segments and the regional markets
– Market Trends (Drivers, Constraints, Opportunities, Threats, Challenges, Investment Opportunities, and recommendations)
– Strategic recommendations in key business segments based on the market estimations
– Competitive landscaping mapping the key common trends
– Company profiling with detailed strategies, financials, and recent developments
– Supply chain trends mapping the latest technological advancements

Continued…

Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.Com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (US) Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (UK)

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Global Electromagnetic Clutches Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2021

This report studies Electromagnetic Clutches in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India

PUNE, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ —

Summary

This report studies Electromagnetic Clutches in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering
Covering
Mitsubishi Electric
Minebea
Osaki
Karl E. Brinkmann
Miki Pulley
Goizper
Danaher
Magtrol
Intorq
Ortlinghaus
Mayr
Merobel
Kobelco
Tianjin Electric
Chuang Xin
Guangde Lixin
Tian Ji
Steki
Chain Tail
Yan Clutch
Ogura Clutch
Kendrion
Hofo
Jiangyin Changsheng
Langfang Xinjia
Guang Da Motor
China Wanxiang

Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/812044-global-electromagnetic-clutches-market-research-report-2016

Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Electromagnetic Clutches in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Southeast Asia
India

Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into
Dry type
Wet type
Magnetic powder type

Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Electromagnetic Clutches in each application, can be divided into
Automotive Industry
Machine Tool
Others

At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/812044-global-electromagnetic-clutches-market-research-report-2016

Table of Contents

Global Electromagnetic Clutches Market Research Report 2016
1 Electromagnetic Clutches Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Electromagnetic Clutches
1.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Electromagnetic Clutches by Type in 2015
1.2.2 Dry type
1.2.3 Wet type
1.2.4 Magnetic powder type
1.3 Electromagnetic Clutches Segment by Application
1.3.1 Electromagnetic Clutches Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015
1.3.2 Automotive Industry
1.3.3 Machine Tool
1.3.4 Others
1.4 Electromagnetic Clutches Market by Region
1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Electromagnetic Clutches (2011-2021)

2 Global Electromagnetic Clutches Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Electromagnetic Clutches Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.2 Global Electromagnetic Clutches Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.3 Global Electromagnetic Clutches Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.4 Manufacturers Electromagnetic Clutches Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type
2.5 Electromagnetic Clutches Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.5.1 Electromagnetic Clutches Market Concentration Rate
2.5.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers
2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion

7 Global Electromagnetic Clutches Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis
7.1 Covering
7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.1.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.1.2.1 Type I
7.1.2.2 Type II
7.1.3 Covering Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.2 Mitsubishi Electric
7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.2.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.2.2.1 Type I
7.2.2.2 Type II
7.2.3 Mitsubishi Electric Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.3 Minebea
7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.3.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.3.2.1 Type I
7.3.2.2 Type II
7.3.3 Minebea Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.4 Osaki
7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.4.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.4.2.1 Type I
7.4.2.2 Type II
7.4.3 Osaki Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.5 Karl E. Brinkmann
7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.5.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.5.2.1 Type I
7.5.2.2 Type II
7.5.3 Karl E. Brinkmann Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.6 Miki Pulley
7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.6.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.6.2.1 Type I
7.6.2.2 Type II
7.6.3 Miki Pulley Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.7 Goizper
7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.7.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.7.2.1 Type I
7.7.2.2 Type II
7.7.3 Goizper Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.8 Danaher
7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.8.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.8.2.1 Type I
7.8.2.2 Type II
7.8.3 Danaher Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.9 Magtrol
7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.9.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.9.2.1 Type I
7.9.2.2 Type II
7.9.3 Magtrol Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.10 Intorq
7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.10.2 Electromagnetic Clutches Product Type, Application and Specification
7.10.2.1 Type I
7.10.2.2 Type II
7.10.3 Intorq Electromagnetic Clutches Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.11 Ortlinghaus
7.12 Mayr
7.13 Merobel
7.14 Kobelco
7.15 Tianjin Electric
7.16 Chuang Xin
7.17 Guangde Lixin
7.18 Tian Ji
7.19 Steki
7.20 Chain Tail
7.21 Yan Clutch
7.22 Ogura Clutch
7.23 Kendrion
7.24 Hofo
7.25 Jiangyin Changsheng
7.26 Langfang Xinjia
7.27 Guang Da Motor
7.28 China Wanxiang

…..Continued

Buy Now This Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=812044

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Europe Dairy Ingredient Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2021

This report studies sales (consumption) of Dairy Ingredient in Europe market, especially in Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Benelux and Spain

PUNE, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ —

Summary

This report studies sales (consumption) of Dairy Ingredient in Europe market, especially in Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Benelux and Spain, focuses on top players in these countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these Countries, covering
FrieslandCampina
Fonterra Co-Operative Group
Dairy Farmers of America
Arla Foods.
Glanbia Plc.
Euroserum
Groupe Lactalis
Saputo Inc.
Volac International Limited
Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited

Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/796097-europe-dairy-ingredient-market-report-2016

Market Segment by Countries, this report splits Europe into several key Countries, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Dairy Ingredient in these countries, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like
Germany
France
UK
Russia
Italy
Spain
Benelux

Split by product type, with sales, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into
Milk Powder
Whey Ingredients
MPC & MPI
Lactose & its Derivatives
Casein & Caseinates
Others

Split by application, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Dairy Ingredient in each application, can be divided into
Bakery & Confectionery
Dairy Products
Convenience Foods
Infant Milk Formula
Other Food Products

Energy crops biogas project

At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/796097-europe-dairy-ingredient-market-report-2016

Table of Contents

Europe Dairy Ingredient Market Report 2016
1 Dairy Ingredient Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Dairy Ingredient
1.2 Classification of Dairy Ingredient
1.2.1 Milk Powder
1.2.2 Whey Ingredients
1.2.3 MPC & MPI
1.2.4 Lactose & its Derivatives
1.2.5 Casein & Caseinates
1.2.6 Others
1.3 Application of Dairy Ingredient
1.3.1 Bakery & Confectionery
1.3.2 Dairy Products
1.3.3 Convenience Foods
1.3.4 Infant Milk Formula
1.3.5 Other Food Products
1.4 Dairy Ingredient Market by Countries
1.4.1 Germany Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.2 France Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.3 UK Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.4 Russia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.5 Italy Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.6 Spain Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.7 Benelux Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.5 Europe Market Size (Value and Volume) of Dairy Ingredient (2011-2021)
1.5.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)
1.5.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)

2 Europe Dairy Ingredient by Manufacturers, Type and Application
2.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.1.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient (Volume and Value) by Type
2.2.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)
2.2.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)
2.3 Europe Dairy Ingredient (Volume and Value) by Countries
2.3.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Sales and Market Share by Countries (2011-2016)
2.3.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient Revenue and Market Share by Countries (2011-2016)
2.4 Europe Dairy Ingredient (Volume) by Application

10 Europe Dairy Ingredient Manufacturers Analysis
10.1 FrieslandCampina
10.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.1.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.1.2.1 Type I
10.1.2.2 Type II
10.1.3 FrieslandCampina Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.2 Fonterra Co-Operative Group
10.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.2.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.2.2.1 Type I
10.2.2.2 Type II
10.2.3 Fonterra Co-Operative Group Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.3 Dairy Farmers of America
10.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.3.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.3.2.1 Type I
10.3.2.2 Type II
10.3.3 Dairy Farmers of America Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.4 Arla Foods.
10.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.4.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.4.2.1 Type I
10.4.2.2 Type II
10.4.3 Arla Foods. Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.5 Glanbia Plc.
10.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.5.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.5.2.1 Type I
10.5.2.2 Type II
10.5.3 Glanbia Plc. Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.6 Euroserum
10.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.6.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.6.2.1 Type I
10.6.2.2 Type II
10.6.3 Euroserum Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.7 Groupe Lactalis
10.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.7.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.7.2.1 Type I
10.7.2.2 Type II
10.7.3 Groupe Lactalis Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.8 Saputo Inc.
10.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.8.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.8.2.1 Type I
10.8.2.2 Type II
10.8.3 Saputo Inc. Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.9 Volac International Limited
10.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.9.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.9.2.1 Type I
10.9.2.2 Type II
10.9.3 Volac International Limited Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.10 Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited
10.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.10.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.10.2.1 Type I
10.10.2.2 Type II
10.10.3 Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview

…..Continued

Buy Now This Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=796097

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Global Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2021

This report studies Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India

PUNE, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ —

Summary

This report studies Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering
Bosch Packaging Technology
GEA
Tetra Laval
MULTIVAC
ARPAC
Bajaj ProcessPack Limited
Combi Packaging Systems
Nichrome Packaging Solutions
Orbital Food Machinery
SAMA Engineering
Selo
Triangle Package Machinery
VELTEKO
WeighPack Systems

Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/770307-global-food-and-beverage-packaging-machinery-market-research-report-2016

Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Southeast Asia
India

Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into
Type I
Type II
Type III

Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery in each application, can be divided into
Application 1
Application 2
Application 3

At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/770307-global-food-and-beverage-packaging-machinery-market-research-report-2016

Table of Contents

Global Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Market Research Report 2016
1 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery
1.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery by Type in 2015
1.2.2 Type I
1.2.3 Type II
1.2.4 Type III
1.3 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Segment by Application
1.3.1 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015
1.3.2 Application 1
1.3.3 Application 2
1.3.4 Application 3
1.4 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Market by Region
1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery (2011-2021)

7 Global Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis
7.1 Bosch Packaging Technology
7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.1.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.1.2.1 Type I
7.1.2.2 Type II
7.1.3 Bosch Packaging Technology Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.2 GEA
7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.2.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.2.2.1 Type I
7.2.2.2 Type II
7.2.3 GEA Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.3 Tetra Laval
7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.3.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.3.2.1 Type I
7.3.2.2 Type II
7.3.3 Tetra Laval Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.4 MULTIVAC
7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.4.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.4.2.1 Type I
7.4.2.2 Type II
7.4.3 MULTIVAC Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.5 ARPAC
7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.5.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.5.2.1 Type I
7.5.2.2 Type II
7.5.3 ARPAC Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.6 Bajaj ProcessPack Limited
7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.6.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.6.2.1 Type I
7.6.2.2 Type II
7.6.3 Bajaj ProcessPack Limited Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.7 Combi Packaging Systems
7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.7.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.7.2.1 Type I
7.7.2.2 Type II
7.7.3 Combi Packaging Systems Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.8 Nichrome Packaging Solutions
7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.8.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.8.2.1 Type I
7.8.2.2 Type II
7.8.3 Nichrome Packaging Solutions Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.9 Orbital Food Machinery
7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.9.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.9.2.1 Type I
7.9.2.2 Type II
7.9.3 Orbital Food Machinery Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.10 SAMA Engineering
7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.10.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.10.2.1 Type I
7.10.2.2 Type II
7.10.3 SAMA Engineering Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.11 Selo
7.12 Triangle Package Machinery
7.13 VELTEKO
7.14 WeighPack Systems

Buy Now This Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=770307

…..Continued

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Global Glass Screen Protector Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2021

This report studies Glass Screen Protector in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India

PUNE, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ —

Summary

This report studies Glass Screen Protector in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with Production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering
RunGiant
SZGXS
ZAGG
XUENAIR
Belkin
JUZHE
Elephant Electronic
CJY Tech
Kindwei
Ehang Electronic
L & I
Zupool
YDFH
Jcpal
Yoobao
Momax
Tech Armor
Enicetytech
BENKS
Body Guardz
Amplim
IntelliARMOR
ICarez
Mcdodo

Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/812512-global-glass-screen-protector-market-research-report-2016

Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Glass Screen Protector in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Southeast Asia
India

Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into
0.15 mm
0.2 mm
0.33 mm
0.4 mm
Other thickness

Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Glass Screen Protector in each application, can be divided into
Smartphone
Tablet
Others

At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/812512-global-glass-screen-protector-market-research-report-2016

Table of Contents

Global Glass Screen Protector Market Research Report 2016
1 Glass Screen Protector Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Glass Screen Protector
1.2 Glass Screen Protector Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Glass Screen Protector by Type in 2015
1.2.2 0.15 mm
1.2.3 0.2 mm
1.2.4 0.33 mm
1.2.5 0.4 mm
1.2.6 Other thickness
1.3 Glass Screen Protector Segment by Application
1.3.1 Glass Screen Protector Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015
1.3.2 Smartphone
1.3.3 Tablet
1.3.4 Others
1.4 Glass Screen Protector Market by Region
1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Glass Screen Protector (2011-2021)

2 Global Glass Screen Protector Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Glass Screen Protector Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.2 Global Glass Screen Protector Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.3 Global Glass Screen Protector Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.4 Manufacturers Glass Screen Protector Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type
2.5 Glass Screen Protector Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.5.1 Glass Screen Protector Market Concentration Rate
2.5.2 Glass Screen Protector Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers
2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion

7 Global Glass Screen Protector Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis
7.1 RunGiant
7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.1.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.1.2.1 Type I
7.1.2.2 Type II
7.1.3 RunGiant Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.2 SZGXS
7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.2.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.2.2.1 Type I
7.2.2.2 Type II
7.2.3 SZGXS Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.3 ZAGG
7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.3.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.3.2.1 Type I
7.3.2.2 Type II
7.3.3 ZAGG Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.4 XUENAIR
7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.4.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.4.2.1 Type I
7.4.2.2 Type II
7.4.3 XUENAIR Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.5 Belkin
7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.5.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.5.2.1 Type I
7.5.2.2 Type II
7.5.3 Belkin Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.6 JUZHE
7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.6.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.6.2.1 Type I
7.6.2.2 Type II
7.6.3 JUZHE Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.7 Elephant Electronic
7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.7.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.7.2.1 Type I
7.7.2.2 Type II
7.7.3 Elephant Electronic Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.8 CJY Tech
7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.8.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.8.2.1 Type I
7.8.2.2 Type II
7.8.3 CJY Tech Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.9 Kindwei
7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.9.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.9.2.1 Type I
7.9.2.2 Type II
7.9.3 Kindwei Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.10 Ehang Electronic
7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.10.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.10.2.1 Type I
7.10.2.2 Type II
7.10.3 Ehang Electronic Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.11 L & I
7.12 Zupool
7.13 YDFH
7.14 Jcpal
7.15 Yoobao
7.16 Momax
7.17 Tech Armor
7.18 Enicetytech
7.19 BENKS
7.20 Body Guardz
7.21 Amplim
7.22 IntelliARMOR
7.23 ICarez
7.24 Mcdodo

…..Continued

Buy Now This Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=812512

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Arizona Attorney General Sued for Not Enforcing the ADA – (working hyperlinks added)

Members of AID Take Brnovich to Court for Turning a Blind Eye to Over 9,000 Documented ADA Violations

MESA, ARIZONA, MARICOPA, December 10, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — NOTE: Working Hyperlinks Added.

Members of Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundation ("AID"), filed a lawsuit <http://www.aid.org/complaint.pdf)>known as a writ of mandamus, against the Arizona State Attorney General, Mark Brnovich (“AG”), for failing to enforce the AzDA as required by Arizona statute in regards to over 9,000 ADA violation complaints. A writ of mandamus is filed to compel a party to execute or complete a duty they are legally bound to complete, in this case, enforcement of the Arizonans with Disabilities Act by the AG.

The AG has been fighting AID’s civil rights efforts to shock Arizona businesses into compliance with the 26-year-old ADA, claiming AID’s only interest is to bilk settlement funds from business owners (see: Arizona State’s Motion to Dismiss <http://aid.org/090506/Arizona%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20and%20Motion%20for%20Judgment%20on%20the%20Pleadings.pdf> while disregarding the knowledge that AID has made zero profits from its civil rights endeavors and operates at a huge loss. The AG has justified his fight by claiming he is the only one that can enforce the ADA, as noted in the AG’s interview with ABC 15’s Dave Biscobing, who has been called an inaccurate reporter by the state of Arizona’s own representative (see: Dave Biscobing “is inaccurate” <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDURuw_K6uY>), despite the fact that Arizona statute and the Arizona Court of Appeals state AID can enforce compliance:

“[The Arizonans with Disabilities] Act separately authorizes both an aggrieved individual and the Attorney General to institute civil actions to redress discrimination.” Bailey-Null v. ValueOptions, 221 Ariz. 63, 69, 209 P.3d 1059, 1065 (Ct. App. 2009). “By the express terms of the regulations, an aggrieved party need not avail herself of the administrative process provided by the Attorney General before bringing a civil action for discrimination under the Act.” Id. “Nothing in the Act or the regulations provides for, much less requires, any other administrative process as a prerequisite to a civil action.” Id. (emphasis added).

Arizona regulations rebut the AG’s patently false statement. “Failure to file an administrative complaint pursuant to [Arizona Administrative Code discussing the Arizonans with Disabilities Act] does not prevent an aggrieved person from bringing a civil action in Superior Court pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1492.08,” Ariz. Admin. Code R10-3-405.

While there is no requirement for any person to submit a complaint to the Attorney General before filing a lawsuit against a civil rights violator, AID chose to give the AG’s office a chance to redeem itself and AID prepared and served over 9,000 ADA violation complaints on the AG at a cost of nearly $200,000 to AID. Upon delivery and service to the office of the Attorney General, the delivery company said the staff there “appeared confused and didn’t even know what to do with ADA complaints.”

Now that this writ of mandamus has been filed, the Attorney General must respond and explain to the court why they have not had any communication with complaining parties regarding 9,000 AzDA complaints in compliance with AzDA statute and why they are not enforcing the AzDA on a broader scale through periodic AzDA inspections.
The key to ADA compliance is private enforcement. Unfortunately, the AG is fighting against private ADA enforcement; instead, he is providing cover and support for the ADA and civil rights offending businesses. “Why would any business voluntarily comply with the ADA, when no government agency cares about enforcement and individuals with disabilities are afraid to complain for fear repercussions and of being banned from that location?” asked Mr. Callan rhetorically.

If the AG gets his way, violating the civil rights guaranteed by the ADA will become penalty free. To make matters worse for the disabled community, the AG is now also supporting a proposed amendment to law to allow ADA violators to have a grace period of 120 days from the time that someone complains to them to fix their violations without any potential penalty, even though the current law has been in place for over 26 years. AID knows this is a pointless and discriminatory requirement; it mailed out over 40,000 notices and found tens of thousands of businesses still did not take any corrective action. “If this law is approved, it would be the same as requiring the police to visit a criminal and tell them they have 120 days to stop committing the crime or they’d risk getting in trouble. There’s no incentive to comply. Only businesses that already care about individuals with disabilities would comply on their own, and that number by AID’s surveys is apparently less than 3% of Arizona businesses.” Stated Mr. Callan.

“It is unsettling but common that AID hears about individuals with disabilities being denied equal use of facilities and bathrooms and even threatened, intimidated or banned from the location when they complain about ADA violations. It is extremely sad when we at AID hear of injuries and even death that have been caused by an ADA violation. But this is Arizona, the Wild West, and the AG, who is by law to act as the “Sheriff” to enforce the ADA laws, has apparently decided, on his own, that the civil rights of those with disabilities do not matter… and if you are willing to fight for and protect their rights the “Sheriff” will come after you to stop you,” stated Mr. Callan.

AID’s altruistic intentions remain pure and highly effective… To date AID’s enforcement efforts have cost over $1.7 Million, with nearly $800,000 just in court fees. While ALL of AID’s compliance settlement agreements require timely ADA violation correction guarantees, some settlement agreements also may include a negotiated cash component of less than $3,400 per case to cover legal, filing, operational and further compliance actions, etc. Never $10,000 per case and far less than media sources falsely portray. The reason it is necessary for AID to receive these proceeds as part of settlement (approx. $1.2M to date) is to subsidize the costs of identifying, documenting, bringing and managing widespread ADA enforcement actions. Doing so is very costly, and AID does not use any tax funds to investigate and enforce ADA laws. AID’s altruistic efforts and results are made abundantly clear by the fact that AID always has, currently is and anticipates it continue to operate at a substantial loss reaching many hundreds of thousands of dollars. It is definitely clear that AID is NOT “enriching itself”, “lining its pockets” or “just in it for the money” because AID has not and does not expect to make a profit. As the math shows… AID’s expenses of $1,700,000 minus $1,200,000 collected settlement funds equals a current deficit of over $500,000.

AID is pleased with the growing understanding and support of its mission by not only its growing membership base, but also those who support AID’s efforts privately or secretly because of their fears of repercussions or retaliation from those without disabilities. AID is not fearful of such retaliation and will not succumb to negative pressures.

—————
Join AID.org’s fight against discrimination by becoming a FREE member and/or report ADA violations at http://aid.org/membership-report-violation.html .
—————
AID’s Attorneys available for comment:
Peter Strojnik (602) 524-6602

About Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundation
AID has formally submitted over 9,000 separate ADA violation complaints with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, each against separate businesses documenting and reporting their ongoing civil rights violations and continued discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Additionally, AID has filled nearly 2,000 additional documented ADA violation cases in court which the Arizona Attorney General’s Office is trying to have dismissed in favor of the ADA violating businesses. AID has spent over $1,700,000 in bringing these 11,000 plus ADA violation civil rights cases in Arizona as part of AID’s efforts to bring about ADA compliance, and has always operated at deficit.

Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities Foundation, a 501c3 nonprofit company was formed in January 2016 to receive contributions/distributions/benefits/services from the operating entity Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities, LLC. These entities often collectively or individually referred to as AID or AID.org by many, operate as Civil Rights Champions with combined goals of improving the lives of individuals with disabilities through charitable gifts, opportunities and the removal of equal access barriers for the over 43 million Americans who live with disabilities caused by one or more conditions.

AID.org sends warning notices to businesses and then acts as private attorneys general to ensure ADA compliance. AID.org’s focus is on the most readily visible exterior equal access barriers which Federal, State and Attorney Generals have failed to enforce over the last 26 years. AID.org feels that these violations are a clear indicator of interior ADA violations, which we hope the violating business voluntarily correct.

“For the ADA to yield its promise of equal access for the disabled, it may indeed be necessary and desirable for committed individuals to bring serial litigation advancing the time when public accommodations will be compliant with the ADA.” AID.org is committed to bring serial litigation and is primarily self-funded though litigation settlement agreements and private funding.

Those with disabilities and their associates can request assistance and grants online at www.AID.org. To schedule an interview with the AID.org Foundation, please email media@AID.org.

Media Rep.
Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundati
602) 524-6602
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Retaliation against Whistle-blowers Serving the Disabled in New York State



Jonathan Carey “Champion for the Disabled” Born September 12,1993 Killed by caregivers on February 15,2007


The Albany Times Union brings to light what New York State top officials are doing to whistle-blowers and those that simply tell the truth.

The horrors, cover-ups and retaliation continue unchecked throughout New York State, federal criminal investigations and civil rights investigations are vital.

— Michael Carey- Advocate for 1,000,000 New Yorkers with disabilities

DELMAR, NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, December 10, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — http://www.timesunion.com/tuplus-local/article/New-York-OPWDD-worker-claims-retaliation-for-10787117.php
As the father of Jonathan Carey who was developmentally disabled and had autism and only 13 when he was killed by his New York State caregivers I am outraged. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/06/nyregion/boys-death-highlights-crisis-in-homes-for-disabled.html and https://www.nytimes.com/video/nyregion/100000000849083/a-failure-to-protect.html . The horrors, cover-ups and retaliation continue unchecked throughout New York State, federal criminal investigations and civil rights investigations are vital. The injustices, gross incompetence, gross negligence of not providing safe care and services that are free from abuse and neglect in NYS, as well as the retaliation against people that do what is right must be stopped.
Through the Jonathan Carey Foundation www.jonathancareyfoundation.org it is important to bring to light what is going on in New York State behind closed doors. I have attached a letter to Deputy Secretary of Health, Paul Francis, who to date has ignored dozens of my requests to take EMERGENCY actions protect and save the lives of countless innocent and extremely vulnerable children and adults with disabilities living in known unsafe and extremely dangerous and deadly facilities and group homes. As Deputy Secretary of Health Paul Francis, whom is directly under the authority of Governor Andrew Cuomo, looks the other way, thousands of reports of abuse and neglect and deaths are being reported to another State agency he oversees. Most of the reported incidents, in many cases crimes, never are reported to local authorities and never are criminally investigated. Most deaths numbering in the hundreds monthly are never reported to County Medical Examiners and Coroners or the County elected District Attorney. The cover-ups are massive in scope and Deputy Secretary of Health Francis is fully aware and he is doing nothing to stop these atrocities.
Here is the open letter sent today to Deputy Secretary of Health Francis via email Paul.Francis@exec.ny.gov
Dear Deputy Secretary of Health Francis,
You also have the direct responsibility to stop the retaliation against whistle-blowers such as myself, Jeff Monsour and those employed like Mr. Willett that simply speak the truth and testify of the unsafe conditions that are endangering the safety, health and lives of innocent and extremely vulnerable children and adults with disabilities.
I have requested of you numerous times along with former Deputy Secretaries of Health James Introne and Courtney Burke to STOP the blatant retaliation against Jeff Monsour and to honor Governor Cuomo's directive to get Jeff Monsour out of the known OPWDD hostile work environment and promote him to a well paying job of his liking. Each of you have failed to do so. Instead, the retaliatory attacks against him and those that verify the truth of what is going on behind closed doors such as Mr. Willett continue.

Now that you are being personally and publicly named in the Times Union are you finally going to STOP the retaliation, finally ensure the promotion of Jeff Monsour whom I believe to be a hero and probably the best caregiver throughout NYS? Mr. Monsour also was part of saving a person with disabilities life and his heroic efforts never were recognized.
OPWDD is an unsafe State agency operating lawlessly in such levels of incompetence and gross negligence. This rogue entity with no genuine oversight directly allows countless innocent people to suffer severe injuries or death by individuals that should have been removed from employment and prosecuted. At the same time, people that try to actually do what is critical to protect and save lives are retaliated against and you do nothing? Stop the foolishness, stop the massive Medicaid fraud, stop the preventable crimes and cover-ups of crimes and deaths, stop the blatant discrimination in civil rights, stop the bypassing of 911, stop the unsafe care and conditions, stop denying the disabled equal protection of laws and stop the protection of abusers, pedophiles, those that are involved in wrongful deaths and incompetent administrators involved in Medicaid fraud and criminal cover-ups.

Michael Carey
Mr.
5188529377
email us here

The testimony of the Incredible life and tragic death of Jonathan Carey, who was disabled and only 13 when he was killed by his New York State caregivers


Source: EIN Presswire