Europe Dairy Ingredient Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2021

This report studies sales (consumption) of Dairy Ingredient in Europe market, especially in Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Benelux and Spain

PUNE, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ —

Summary

This report studies sales (consumption) of Dairy Ingredient in Europe market, especially in Germany, UK, France, Russia, Italy, Benelux and Spain, focuses on top players in these countries, with sales, price, revenue and market share for each player in these Countries, covering
FrieslandCampina
Fonterra Co-Operative Group
Dairy Farmers of America
Arla Foods.
Glanbia Plc.
Euroserum
Groupe Lactalis
Saputo Inc.
Volac International Limited
Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited

Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/796097-europe-dairy-ingredient-market-report-2016

Market Segment by Countries, this report splits Europe into several key Countries, with sales (consumption), revenue, market share and growth rate of Dairy Ingredient in these countries, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like
Germany
France
UK
Russia
Italy
Spain
Benelux

Split by product type, with sales, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into
Milk Powder
Whey Ingredients
MPC & MPI
Lactose & its Derivatives
Casein & Caseinates
Others

Split by application, this report focuses on sales, market share and growth rate of Dairy Ingredient in each application, can be divided into
Bakery & Confectionery
Dairy Products
Convenience Foods
Infant Milk Formula
Other Food Products

Energy crops biogas project

At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/796097-europe-dairy-ingredient-market-report-2016

Table of Contents

Europe Dairy Ingredient Market Report 2016
1 Dairy Ingredient Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Dairy Ingredient
1.2 Classification of Dairy Ingredient
1.2.1 Milk Powder
1.2.2 Whey Ingredients
1.2.3 MPC & MPI
1.2.4 Lactose & its Derivatives
1.2.5 Casein & Caseinates
1.2.6 Others
1.3 Application of Dairy Ingredient
1.3.1 Bakery & Confectionery
1.3.2 Dairy Products
1.3.3 Convenience Foods
1.3.4 Infant Milk Formula
1.3.5 Other Food Products
1.4 Dairy Ingredient Market by Countries
1.4.1 Germany Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.2 France Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.3 UK Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.4 Russia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.5 Italy Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.6 Spain Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.7 Benelux Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.5 Europe Market Size (Value and Volume) of Dairy Ingredient (2011-2021)
1.5.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Sales and Growth Rate (2011-2021)
1.5.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient Revenue and Growth Rate (2011-2021)

2 Europe Dairy Ingredient by Manufacturers, Type and Application
2.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Sales and Market Share of Key Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.1.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient (Volume and Value) by Type
2.2.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Sales and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)
2.2.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient Revenue and Market Share by Type (2011-2016)
2.3 Europe Dairy Ingredient (Volume and Value) by Countries
2.3.1 Europe Dairy Ingredient Sales and Market Share by Countries (2011-2016)
2.3.2 Europe Dairy Ingredient Revenue and Market Share by Countries (2011-2016)
2.4 Europe Dairy Ingredient (Volume) by Application

10 Europe Dairy Ingredient Manufacturers Analysis
10.1 FrieslandCampina
10.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.1.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.1.2.1 Type I
10.1.2.2 Type II
10.1.3 FrieslandCampina Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.2 Fonterra Co-Operative Group
10.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.2.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.2.2.1 Type I
10.2.2.2 Type II
10.2.3 Fonterra Co-Operative Group Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.3 Dairy Farmers of America
10.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.3.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.3.2.1 Type I
10.3.2.2 Type II
10.3.3 Dairy Farmers of America Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.4 Arla Foods.
10.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.4.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.4.2.1 Type I
10.4.2.2 Type II
10.4.3 Arla Foods. Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.5 Glanbia Plc.
10.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.5.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.5.2.1 Type I
10.5.2.2 Type II
10.5.3 Glanbia Plc. Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.6 Euroserum
10.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.6.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.6.2.1 Type I
10.6.2.2 Type II
10.6.3 Euroserum Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.7 Groupe Lactalis
10.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.7.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.7.2.1 Type I
10.7.2.2 Type II
10.7.3 Groupe Lactalis Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.8 Saputo Inc.
10.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.8.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.8.2.1 Type I
10.8.2.2 Type II
10.8.3 Saputo Inc. Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.9 Volac International Limited
10.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.9.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.9.2.1 Type I
10.9.2.2 Type II
10.9.3 Volac International Limited Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview
10.10 Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited
10.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Competitors
10.10.2 Dairy Ingredient Product Type, Application and Specification
10.10.2.1 Type I
10.10.2.2 Type II
10.10.3 Murray Goulburn Co-Operative Co. Limited Dairy Ingredient Sales, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2011-2016)
10.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview

…..Continued

Buy Now This Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=796097

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Global Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2021

This report studies Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India

PUNE, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ —

Summary

This report studies Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering
Bosch Packaging Technology
GEA
Tetra Laval
MULTIVAC
ARPAC
Bajaj ProcessPack Limited
Combi Packaging Systems
Nichrome Packaging Solutions
Orbital Food Machinery
SAMA Engineering
Selo
Triangle Package Machinery
VELTEKO
WeighPack Systems

Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/770307-global-food-and-beverage-packaging-machinery-market-research-report-2016

Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Southeast Asia
India

Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into
Type I
Type II
Type III

Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery in each application, can be divided into
Application 1
Application 2
Application 3

At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/770307-global-food-and-beverage-packaging-machinery-market-research-report-2016

Table of Contents

Global Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Market Research Report 2016
1 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery
1.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery by Type in 2015
1.2.2 Type I
1.2.3 Type II
1.2.4 Type III
1.3 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Segment by Application
1.3.1 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015
1.3.2 Application 1
1.3.3 Application 2
1.3.4 Application 3
1.4 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Market by Region
1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery (2011-2021)

7 Global Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis
7.1 Bosch Packaging Technology
7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.1.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.1.2.1 Type I
7.1.2.2 Type II
7.1.3 Bosch Packaging Technology Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.2 GEA
7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.2.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.2.2.1 Type I
7.2.2.2 Type II
7.2.3 GEA Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.3 Tetra Laval
7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.3.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.3.2.1 Type I
7.3.2.2 Type II
7.3.3 Tetra Laval Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.4 MULTIVAC
7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.4.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.4.2.1 Type I
7.4.2.2 Type II
7.4.3 MULTIVAC Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.5 ARPAC
7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.5.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.5.2.1 Type I
7.5.2.2 Type II
7.5.3 ARPAC Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.6 Bajaj ProcessPack Limited
7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.6.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.6.2.1 Type I
7.6.2.2 Type II
7.6.3 Bajaj ProcessPack Limited Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.7 Combi Packaging Systems
7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.7.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.7.2.1 Type I
7.7.2.2 Type II
7.7.3 Combi Packaging Systems Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.8 Nichrome Packaging Solutions
7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.8.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.8.2.1 Type I
7.8.2.2 Type II
7.8.3 Nichrome Packaging Solutions Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.9 Orbital Food Machinery
7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.9.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.9.2.1 Type I
7.9.2.2 Type II
7.9.3 Orbital Food Machinery Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.10 SAMA Engineering
7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.10.2 Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Product Type, Application and Specification
7.10.2.1 Type I
7.10.2.2 Type II
7.10.3 SAMA Engineering Food and Beverage Packaging Machinery Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.11 Selo
7.12 Triangle Package Machinery
7.13 VELTEKO
7.14 WeighPack Systems

Buy Now This Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=770307

…..Continued

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Global Glass Screen Protector Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2021

This report studies Glass Screen Protector in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India

PUNE, INDIA, December 12, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ —

Summary

This report studies Glass Screen Protector in Global market, especially in North America, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia and India, focuses on top manufacturers in global market, with Production, price, revenue and market share for each manufacturer, covering
RunGiant
SZGXS
ZAGG
XUENAIR
Belkin
JUZHE
Elephant Electronic
CJY Tech
Kindwei
Ehang Electronic
L & I
Zupool
YDFH
Jcpal
Yoobao
Momax
Tech Armor
Enicetytech
BENKS
Body Guardz
Amplim
IntelliARMOR
ICarez
Mcdodo

Request a Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/812512-global-glass-screen-protector-market-research-report-2016

Market Segment by Regions, this report splits Global into several key Regions, with production, consumption, revenue, market share and growth rate of Glass Screen Protector in these regions, from 2011 to 2021 (forecast), like
North America
Europe
China
Japan
Southeast Asia
India

Split by product type, with production, revenue, price, market share and growth rate of each type, can be divided into
0.15 mm
0.2 mm
0.33 mm
0.4 mm
Other thickness

Split by application, this report focuses on consumption, market share and growth rate of Glass Screen Protector in each application, can be divided into
Smartphone
Tablet
Others

At any Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/812512-global-glass-screen-protector-market-research-report-2016

Table of Contents

Global Glass Screen Protector Market Research Report 2016
1 Glass Screen Protector Market Overview
1.1 Product Overview and Scope of Glass Screen Protector
1.2 Glass Screen Protector Segment by Type
1.2.1 Global Production Market Share of Glass Screen Protector by Type in 2015
1.2.2 0.15 mm
1.2.3 0.2 mm
1.2.4 0.33 mm
1.2.5 0.4 mm
1.2.6 Other thickness
1.3 Glass Screen Protector Segment by Application
1.3.1 Glass Screen Protector Consumption Market Share by Application in 2015
1.3.2 Smartphone
1.3.3 Tablet
1.3.4 Others
1.4 Glass Screen Protector Market by Region
1.4.1 North America Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.2 Europe Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.3 China Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.4 Japan Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.5 Southeast Asia Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.4.6 India Status and Prospect (2011-2021)
1.5 Global Market Size (Value) of Glass Screen Protector (2011-2021)

2 Global Glass Screen Protector Market Competition by Manufacturers
2.1 Global Glass Screen Protector Production and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.2 Global Glass Screen Protector Revenue and Share by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.3 Global Glass Screen Protector Average Price by Manufacturers (2015 and 2016)
2.4 Manufacturers Glass Screen Protector Manufacturing Base Distribution, Sales Area and Product Type
2.5 Glass Screen Protector Market Competitive Situation and Trends
2.5.1 Glass Screen Protector Market Concentration Rate
2.5.2 Glass Screen Protector Market Share of Top 3 and Top 5 Manufacturers
2.5.3 Mergers & Acquisitions, Expansion

7 Global Glass Screen Protector Manufacturers Profiles/Analysis
7.1 RunGiant
7.1.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.1.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.1.2.1 Type I
7.1.2.2 Type II
7.1.3 RunGiant Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.1.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.2 SZGXS
7.2.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.2.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.2.2.1 Type I
7.2.2.2 Type II
7.2.3 SZGXS Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.2.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.3 ZAGG
7.3.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.3.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.3.2.1 Type I
7.3.2.2 Type II
7.3.3 ZAGG Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.3.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.4 XUENAIR
7.4.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.4.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.4.2.1 Type I
7.4.2.2 Type II
7.4.3 XUENAIR Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.4.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.5 Belkin
7.5.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.5.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.5.2.1 Type I
7.5.2.2 Type II
7.5.3 Belkin Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.5.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.6 JUZHE
7.6.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.6.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.6.2.1 Type I
7.6.2.2 Type II
7.6.3 JUZHE Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.6.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.7 Elephant Electronic
7.7.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.7.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.7.2.1 Type I
7.7.2.2 Type II
7.7.3 Elephant Electronic Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.7.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.8 CJY Tech
7.8.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.8.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.8.2.1 Type I
7.8.2.2 Type II
7.8.3 CJY Tech Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.8.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.9 Kindwei
7.9.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.9.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.9.2.1 Type I
7.9.2.2 Type II
7.9.3 Kindwei Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.9.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.10 Ehang Electronic
7.10.1 Company Basic Information, Manufacturing Base and Its Competitors
7.10.2 Glass Screen Protector Product Type, Application and Specification
7.10.2.1 Type I
7.10.2.2 Type II
7.10.3 Ehang Electronic Glass Screen Protector Production, Revenue, Price and Gross Margin (2015 and 2016)
7.10.4 Main Business/Business Overview
7.11 L & I
7.12 Zupool
7.13 YDFH
7.14 Jcpal
7.15 Yoobao
7.16 Momax
7.17 Tech Armor
7.18 Enicetytech
7.19 BENKS
7.20 Body Guardz
7.21 Amplim
7.22 IntelliARMOR
7.23 ICarez
7.24 Mcdodo

…..Continued

Buy Now This Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=812512

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Arizona Attorney General Sued for Not Enforcing the ADA – (working hyperlinks added)

Members of AID Take Brnovich to Court for Turning a Blind Eye to Over 9,000 Documented ADA Violations

MESA, ARIZONA, MARICOPA, December 10, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — NOTE: Working Hyperlinks Added.

Members of Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundation ("AID"), filed a lawsuit <http://www.aid.org/complaint.pdf)>known as a writ of mandamus, against the Arizona State Attorney General, Mark Brnovich (“AG”), for failing to enforce the AzDA as required by Arizona statute in regards to over 9,000 ADA violation complaints. A writ of mandamus is filed to compel a party to execute or complete a duty they are legally bound to complete, in this case, enforcement of the Arizonans with Disabilities Act by the AG.

The AG has been fighting AID’s civil rights efforts to shock Arizona businesses into compliance with the 26-year-old ADA, claiming AID’s only interest is to bilk settlement funds from business owners (see: Arizona State’s Motion to Dismiss <http://aid.org/090506/Arizona%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20and%20Motion%20for%20Judgment%20on%20the%20Pleadings.pdf> while disregarding the knowledge that AID has made zero profits from its civil rights endeavors and operates at a huge loss. The AG has justified his fight by claiming he is the only one that can enforce the ADA, as noted in the AG’s interview with ABC 15’s Dave Biscobing, who has been called an inaccurate reporter by the state of Arizona’s own representative (see: Dave Biscobing “is inaccurate” <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nDURuw_K6uY>), despite the fact that Arizona statute and the Arizona Court of Appeals state AID can enforce compliance:

“[The Arizonans with Disabilities] Act separately authorizes both an aggrieved individual and the Attorney General to institute civil actions to redress discrimination.” Bailey-Null v. ValueOptions, 221 Ariz. 63, 69, 209 P.3d 1059, 1065 (Ct. App. 2009). “By the express terms of the regulations, an aggrieved party need not avail herself of the administrative process provided by the Attorney General before bringing a civil action for discrimination under the Act.” Id. “Nothing in the Act or the regulations provides for, much less requires, any other administrative process as a prerequisite to a civil action.” Id. (emphasis added).

Arizona regulations rebut the AG’s patently false statement. “Failure to file an administrative complaint pursuant to [Arizona Administrative Code discussing the Arizonans with Disabilities Act] does not prevent an aggrieved person from bringing a civil action in Superior Court pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1492.08,” Ariz. Admin. Code R10-3-405.

While there is no requirement for any person to submit a complaint to the Attorney General before filing a lawsuit against a civil rights violator, AID chose to give the AG’s office a chance to redeem itself and AID prepared and served over 9,000 ADA violation complaints on the AG at a cost of nearly $200,000 to AID. Upon delivery and service to the office of the Attorney General, the delivery company said the staff there “appeared confused and didn’t even know what to do with ADA complaints.”

Now that this writ of mandamus has been filed, the Attorney General must respond and explain to the court why they have not had any communication with complaining parties regarding 9,000 AzDA complaints in compliance with AzDA statute and why they are not enforcing the AzDA on a broader scale through periodic AzDA inspections.
The key to ADA compliance is private enforcement. Unfortunately, the AG is fighting against private ADA enforcement; instead, he is providing cover and support for the ADA and civil rights offending businesses. “Why would any business voluntarily comply with the ADA, when no government agency cares about enforcement and individuals with disabilities are afraid to complain for fear repercussions and of being banned from that location?” asked Mr. Callan rhetorically.

If the AG gets his way, violating the civil rights guaranteed by the ADA will become penalty free. To make matters worse for the disabled community, the AG is now also supporting a proposed amendment to law to allow ADA violators to have a grace period of 120 days from the time that someone complains to them to fix their violations without any potential penalty, even though the current law has been in place for over 26 years. AID knows this is a pointless and discriminatory requirement; it mailed out over 40,000 notices and found tens of thousands of businesses still did not take any corrective action. “If this law is approved, it would be the same as requiring the police to visit a criminal and tell them they have 120 days to stop committing the crime or they’d risk getting in trouble. There’s no incentive to comply. Only businesses that already care about individuals with disabilities would comply on their own, and that number by AID’s surveys is apparently less than 3% of Arizona businesses.” Stated Mr. Callan.

“It is unsettling but common that AID hears about individuals with disabilities being denied equal use of facilities and bathrooms and even threatened, intimidated or banned from the location when they complain about ADA violations. It is extremely sad when we at AID hear of injuries and even death that have been caused by an ADA violation. But this is Arizona, the Wild West, and the AG, who is by law to act as the “Sheriff” to enforce the ADA laws, has apparently decided, on his own, that the civil rights of those with disabilities do not matter… and if you are willing to fight for and protect their rights the “Sheriff” will come after you to stop you,” stated Mr. Callan.

AID’s altruistic intentions remain pure and highly effective… To date AID’s enforcement efforts have cost over $1.7 Million, with nearly $800,000 just in court fees. While ALL of AID’s compliance settlement agreements require timely ADA violation correction guarantees, some settlement agreements also may include a negotiated cash component of less than $3,400 per case to cover legal, filing, operational and further compliance actions, etc. Never $10,000 per case and far less than media sources falsely portray. The reason it is necessary for AID to receive these proceeds as part of settlement (approx. $1.2M to date) is to subsidize the costs of identifying, documenting, bringing and managing widespread ADA enforcement actions. Doing so is very costly, and AID does not use any tax funds to investigate and enforce ADA laws. AID’s altruistic efforts and results are made abundantly clear by the fact that AID always has, currently is and anticipates it continue to operate at a substantial loss reaching many hundreds of thousands of dollars. It is definitely clear that AID is NOT “enriching itself”, “lining its pockets” or “just in it for the money” because AID has not and does not expect to make a profit. As the math shows… AID’s expenses of $1,700,000 minus $1,200,000 collected settlement funds equals a current deficit of over $500,000.

AID is pleased with the growing understanding and support of its mission by not only its growing membership base, but also those who support AID’s efforts privately or secretly because of their fears of repercussions or retaliation from those without disabilities. AID is not fearful of such retaliation and will not succumb to negative pressures.

—————
Join AID.org’s fight against discrimination by becoming a FREE member and/or report ADA violations at http://aid.org/membership-report-violation.html .
—————
AID’s Attorneys available for comment:
Peter Strojnik (602) 524-6602

About Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundation
AID has formally submitted over 9,000 separate ADA violation complaints with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, each against separate businesses documenting and reporting their ongoing civil rights violations and continued discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Additionally, AID has filled nearly 2,000 additional documented ADA violation cases in court which the Arizona Attorney General’s Office is trying to have dismissed in favor of the ADA violating businesses. AID has spent over $1,700,000 in bringing these 11,000 plus ADA violation civil rights cases in Arizona as part of AID’s efforts to bring about ADA compliance, and has always operated at deficit.

Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities Foundation, a 501c3 nonprofit company was formed in January 2016 to receive contributions/distributions/benefits/services from the operating entity Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities, LLC. These entities often collectively or individually referred to as AID or AID.org by many, operate as Civil Rights Champions with combined goals of improving the lives of individuals with disabilities through charitable gifts, opportunities and the removal of equal access barriers for the over 43 million Americans who live with disabilities caused by one or more conditions.

AID.org sends warning notices to businesses and then acts as private attorneys general to ensure ADA compliance. AID.org’s focus is on the most readily visible exterior equal access barriers which Federal, State and Attorney Generals have failed to enforce over the last 26 years. AID.org feels that these violations are a clear indicator of interior ADA violations, which we hope the violating business voluntarily correct.

“For the ADA to yield its promise of equal access for the disabled, it may indeed be necessary and desirable for committed individuals to bring serial litigation advancing the time when public accommodations will be compliant with the ADA.” AID.org is committed to bring serial litigation and is primarily self-funded though litigation settlement agreements and private funding.

Those with disabilities and their associates can request assistance and grants online at www.AID.org. To schedule an interview with the AID.org Foundation, please email media@AID.org.

Media Rep.
Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundati
602) 524-6602
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Retaliation against Whistle-blowers Serving the Disabled in New York State



Jonathan Carey “Champion for the Disabled” Born September 12,1993 Killed by caregivers on February 15,2007


The Albany Times Union brings to light what New York State top officials are doing to whistle-blowers and those that simply tell the truth.

The horrors, cover-ups and retaliation continue unchecked throughout New York State, federal criminal investigations and civil rights investigations are vital.

— Michael Carey- Advocate for 1,000,000 New Yorkers with disabilities

DELMAR, NEW YORK, UNITED STATES, December 10, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — http://www.timesunion.com/tuplus-local/article/New-York-OPWDD-worker-claims-retaliation-for-10787117.php
As the father of Jonathan Carey who was developmentally disabled and had autism and only 13 when he was killed by his New York State caregivers I am outraged. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/06/06/nyregion/boys-death-highlights-crisis-in-homes-for-disabled.html and https://www.nytimes.com/video/nyregion/100000000849083/a-failure-to-protect.html . The horrors, cover-ups and retaliation continue unchecked throughout New York State, federal criminal investigations and civil rights investigations are vital. The injustices, gross incompetence, gross negligence of not providing safe care and services that are free from abuse and neglect in NYS, as well as the retaliation against people that do what is right must be stopped.
Through the Jonathan Carey Foundation www.jonathancareyfoundation.org it is important to bring to light what is going on in New York State behind closed doors. I have attached a letter to Deputy Secretary of Health, Paul Francis, who to date has ignored dozens of my requests to take EMERGENCY actions protect and save the lives of countless innocent and extremely vulnerable children and adults with disabilities living in known unsafe and extremely dangerous and deadly facilities and group homes. As Deputy Secretary of Health Paul Francis, whom is directly under the authority of Governor Andrew Cuomo, looks the other way, thousands of reports of abuse and neglect and deaths are being reported to another State agency he oversees. Most of the reported incidents, in many cases crimes, never are reported to local authorities and never are criminally investigated. Most deaths numbering in the hundreds monthly are never reported to County Medical Examiners and Coroners or the County elected District Attorney. The cover-ups are massive in scope and Deputy Secretary of Health Francis is fully aware and he is doing nothing to stop these atrocities.
Here is the open letter sent today to Deputy Secretary of Health Francis via email Paul.Francis@exec.ny.gov
Dear Deputy Secretary of Health Francis,
You also have the direct responsibility to stop the retaliation against whistle-blowers such as myself, Jeff Monsour and those employed like Mr. Willett that simply speak the truth and testify of the unsafe conditions that are endangering the safety, health and lives of innocent and extremely vulnerable children and adults with disabilities.
I have requested of you numerous times along with former Deputy Secretaries of Health James Introne and Courtney Burke to STOP the blatant retaliation against Jeff Monsour and to honor Governor Cuomo's directive to get Jeff Monsour out of the known OPWDD hostile work environment and promote him to a well paying job of his liking. Each of you have failed to do so. Instead, the retaliatory attacks against him and those that verify the truth of what is going on behind closed doors such as Mr. Willett continue.

Now that you are being personally and publicly named in the Times Union are you finally going to STOP the retaliation, finally ensure the promotion of Jeff Monsour whom I believe to be a hero and probably the best caregiver throughout NYS? Mr. Monsour also was part of saving a person with disabilities life and his heroic efforts never were recognized.
OPWDD is an unsafe State agency operating lawlessly in such levels of incompetence and gross negligence. This rogue entity with no genuine oversight directly allows countless innocent people to suffer severe injuries or death by individuals that should have been removed from employment and prosecuted. At the same time, people that try to actually do what is critical to protect and save lives are retaliated against and you do nothing? Stop the foolishness, stop the massive Medicaid fraud, stop the preventable crimes and cover-ups of crimes and deaths, stop the blatant discrimination in civil rights, stop the bypassing of 911, stop the unsafe care and conditions, stop denying the disabled equal protection of laws and stop the protection of abusers, pedophiles, those that are involved in wrongful deaths and incompetent administrators involved in Medicaid fraud and criminal cover-ups.

Michael Carey
Mr.
5188529377
email us here

The testimony of the Incredible life and tragic death of Jonathan Carey, who was disabled and only 13 when he was killed by his New York State caregivers


Source: EIN Presswire

Iran’s President Challenged on student’s day

December 6th, is students day in Iran. This day marks the anniversary of martyrdom of three Iranian students shut dead at Tehran University

STOKHOLM, STOKHOLM, SWEDEN, December 10, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — Iran’s President Challenged on student’s day

By:Hassan Mahmoudi
December 6th, is students day in Iran. This day marks the anniversary of martyrdom of three Iranian students shut dead at Tehran University by the Shah’s forces a day after widespread demonstrations that occurred in Iran in 1953. During the past decades the event has become a national day commemorated by Iran’s students. In recent years despite all the crackdown and suppression of students by the clerical regime the event has been commemorated in Iran, in particular by university students.
After the 1979 revolution the Iranian regime misused Student’s day to their own political benefit. This year President Rouhani visited Tehran University in a ceremony on Dec 6.
Prior to this ceremony Rouhani’s government who fears to confront the students, in order to prevent students from entering this ceremony, distributed special invitation cards among government official and students affiliated to bassij forces (para military suppression forces of Iranian regime), The card as shown in the picture above includes warning that only those invited are allowed to enter the ceremony, It suggest on the card not to give it to anybody else. At the university gate there were restricted check points for card holders. This action reminds the Greek novelist “Nikos Kazantzakis” who aptly said, “Since we cannot change reality, let us change the eyes which see reality.”
Rouhani’s fear from students is based on this fact that the regime in Iran now in its weakest point ever, the officials are worried that students and people’s exasperation and scattered protests merge into a mass uprising such as what happened in 1988. The regime uses executions and imprisonments to suppress people and to postpone such an occurrence. The Secretariat of the National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) reported on Nov. 23 that, “Hassan Norouzi, a member of the regime’s Parliament, in a shocking confession said: '5,000 people aged 20 to 30 years old are on death row. Most of them are first-time drug offenders. (Mehr state run news agency – November 23).'" The NCRI report adds, “Youssefian, another member of parliament, said: “We have executed so many, we execute every day. … Rajaeeshahr 30, another place 20, another place 10, what was the result?

Trump’s Election and Its Influence on Nuclear Deal
In his speech at the ceremony Rouhani referred to the election of Donald Trump as the US President and said (According to Mehr official news agency Dec 6.2016), “A guy has been elected in the US votes. Look how other countries are shaking. The only country that is neither happy nor sad is Iran.”
This is another example of misrepresenting the truth. everyone knows that Donald Trump’s victory in the United States has formed deep concern and fears among officials in Tehran especially in relation to the future of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPA) that was struck in July 2015 between the P5+1 and the Islamic Republic.
Since the victory of President-elect Trump the Ayatollahs in Tehran have reacted with fear and anxiety. Some senior officials in the regime said during the presidency of Barack Obama, "We enjoyed a golden era, and now with, Trump the end of the golden era has begun." So Rouhani’s word at the ceremony is like “whistling a Happy Tune to Answer Fear”.

Hassan Mahmoudi: A human rights advocate and Social Media journalist seeking democracy for Iran and peace for the region.

hassan.mahmoud
human rights social media
004685521385
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Arizona Attorney General Sued for Not Enforcing the ADA

Members of AID Take Brnovich to Court for Turning a Blind Eye to Over 9,000 Documented ADA Violations

MESA, ARIZONA, MARICOPA, December 9, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — Members of Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundation ("AID"), filed a lawsuit known as a writ of mandamus, against the Arizona State Attorney General, Mark Brnovich (“AG”), for failing to enforce the AzDA as required by Arizona statute in regards to over 9,000 ADA violation complaints. A writ of mandamus is filed to compel a party to execute or complete a duty they are legally bound to complete, in this case, enforcement of the Arizonans with Disabilities Act by the AG.

The AG has been fighting AID’s civil rights efforts to shock Arizona businesses into compliance with the 26-year-old ADA, claiming AID’s only interest is to bilk settlement funds from business owners (see: Arizona State’s Motion to Dismiss) while disregarding the knowledge that AID has made zero profits from its civil rights endeavors and operates at a huge loss. The AG has justified his fight by claiming he is the only one that can enforce the ADA, as noted in the AG’s interview with ABC 15’s Dave Biscobing, who has been called an inaccurate reporter by the state of Arizona’s own representative (see: Dave Biscobing “is inaccurate”), despite the fact that Arizona statute and the Arizona Court of Appeals state AID can enforce compliance:

“[The Arizonans with Disabilities] Act separately authorizes both an aggrieved individual and the Attorney General to institute civil actions to redress discrimination.” Bailey-Null v. ValueOptions, 221 Ariz. 63, 69, 209 P.3d 1059, 1065 (Ct. App. 2009). “By the express terms of the regulations, an aggrieved party need not avail herself of the administrative process provided by the Attorney General before bringing a civil action for discrimination under the Act.” Id. “Nothing in the Act or the regulations provides for, much less requires, any other administrative process as a prerequisite to a civil action.” Id. (emphasis added).

Arizona regulations rebut the AG’s patently false statement. “Failure to file an administrative complaint pursuant to [Arizona Administrative Code discussing the Arizonans with Disabilities Act] does not prevent an aggrieved person from bringing a civil action in Superior Court pursuant to A.R.S. § 41-1492.08,” Ariz. Admin. Code R10-3-405.

While there is no requirement for any person to submit a complaint to the Attorney General before filing a lawsuit against a civil rights violator, AID chose to give the AG’s office a chance to redeem itself and AID prepared and served over 9,000 ADA violation complaints on the AG at a cost of nearly $200,000 to AID. Upon delivery and service to the office of the Attorney General, the delivery company said the staff there “appeared confused and didn’t even know what to do with ADA complaints.”

Now that this writ of mandamus has been filed, the Attorney General must respond and explain to the court why they have not had any communication with complaining parties regarding 9,000 AzDA complaints in compliance with AzDA statute and why they are not enforcing the AzDA on a broader scale through periodic AzDA inspections.

The key to ADA compliance is private enforcement. Unfortunately, the AG is fighting against private ADA enforcement; instead, he is providing cover and support for the ADA and civil rights offending businesses. “Why would any business voluntarily comply with the ADA, when no government agency cares about enforcement and individuals with disabilities are afraid to complain for fear repercussions and of being banned from that location?” asked Mr. Callan rhetorically.

If the AG gets his way, violating the civil rights guaranteed by the ADA will become penalty free. To make matters worse for the disabled community, the AG is now also supporting a proposed amendment to law to allow ADA violators to have a grace period of 120 days from the time that someone complains to them to fix their violations without any potential penalty, even though the current law has been in place for over 26 years. AID knows this is a pointless and discriminatory requirement; it mailed out over 40,000 notices and found tens of thousands of businesses still did not take any corrective action. “If this law is approved, it would be the same as requiring the police to visit a criminal and tell them they have 120 days to stop committing the crime or they’d risk getting in trouble. There’s no incentive to comply. Only businesses that already care about individuals with disabilities would comply on their own, and that number by AID’s surveys is apparently less than 3% of Arizona businesses.” Stated Mr. Callan.

“It is unsettling but common that AID hears about individuals with disabilities being denied equal use of facilities and bathrooms and even threatened, intimidated or banned from the location when they complain about ADA violations. It is extremely sad when we at AID hear of injuries and even death that have been caused by an ADA violation. But this is Arizona, the Wild West, and the AG, who is by law to act as the “Sheriff” to enforce the ADA laws, has apparently decided, on his own, that the civil rights of those with disabilities do not matter… and if you are willing to fight for and protect their rights the “Sheriff” will come after you to stop you,” stated Mr. Callan.

AID’s altruistic intentions remain pure and highly effective… To date AID’s enforcement efforts have cost over $1.7 Million, with nearly $800,000 just in court fees. While ALL of AID’s compliance settlement agreements require timely ADA violation correction guarantees, some settlement agreements also may include a negotiated cash component of less than $3,400 per case to cover legal, filing, operational and further compliance actions, etc. Never $10,000 per case and far less than media sources falsely portray. The reason it is necessary for AID to receive these proceeds as part of settlement (approx. $1.2M to date) is to subsidize the costs of identifying, documenting, bringing and managing widespread ADA enforcement actions. Doing so is very costly, and AID does not use any tax funds to investigate and enforce ADA laws. AID’s altruistic efforts and results are made abundantly clear by the fact that AID always has, currently is and anticipates it continue to operate at a substantial loss reaching many hundreds of thousands of dollars. It is definitely clear that AID is NOT “enriching itself”, “lining its pockets” or “just in it for the money” because AID has not and does not expect to make a profit. As the math shows… AID’s expenses of $1,700,000 minus $1,200,000 collected settlement funds equals a current deficit of over $500,000.

AID is pleased with the growing understanding and support of its mission by not only its growing membership base, but also those who support AID’s efforts privately or secretly because of their fears of repercussions or retaliation from those without disabilities. AID is not fearful of such retaliation and will not succumb to negative pressures.

—————
Join AID.org’s fight against discrimination by becoming a FREE member and/or report ADA violations at http://aid.org/membership-report-violation.html .
—————

AID’s Attorneys available for comment:
Peter Strojnik (602) 524-6602

About Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundation

AID has formally submitted over 9,000 separate ADA violation complaints with the Arizona Attorney General’s Office, each against separate businesses documenting and reporting their ongoing civil rights violations and continued discrimination against individuals with disabilities. Additionally, AID has filled nearly 2,000 additional documented ADA violation cases in court which the Arizona Attorney General’s Office is trying to have dismissed in favor of the ADA violating businesses. AID has spent over $1,700,000 in bringing these 11,000 plus ADA violation civil rights cases in Arizona as part of AID’s efforts to bring about ADA compliance, and has always operated at deficit.

Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities Foundation, a 501c3 nonprofit company was formed in January 2016 to receive contributions/distributions/benefits/services from the operating entity Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities, LLC. These entities often collectively or individually referred to as AID or AID.org by many, operate as Civil Rights Champions with combined goals of improving the lives of individuals with disabilities through charitable gifts, opportunities and the removal of equal access barriers for the over 43 million Americans who live with disabilities caused by one or more conditions.

AID.org sends warning notices to businesses and then acts as private attorneys general to ensure ADA compliance. AID.org’s focus is on the most readily visible exterior equal access barriers which Federal, State and Attorney Generals have failed to enforce over the last 26 years. AID.org feels that these violations are a clear indicator of interior ADA violations, which we hope the violating business voluntarily correct.

“For the ADA to yield its promise of equal access for the disabled, it may indeed be necessary and desirable for committed individuals to bring serial litigation advancing the time when public accommodations will be compliant with the ADA.” AID.org is committed to bring serial litigation and is primarily self-funded though litigation settlement agreements and private funding.

Those with disabilities and their associates can request assistance and grants online at www.AID.org. To schedule an interview with the AID.org Foundation, please email media@AID.org.

Media Rep.
Advocates for Individuals with Disabilities – Foundati
602) 524-6602
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

MYANMAR OIL AND GAS NEWS: MiTA Myanmar Oil & Gas Exhibition and Conference in Yangon @ YgTF, 24-26 Feb 2017

MYANMAR OIL & GAS EXPO: 24-26 Feb 2017, annual Expo in Yangon

MiTA: MYANMAR MARKET PARTNER, since 2009

DIGITAL MARKETING IN MYANMAR & GLOBAL BRANDING

MYANMAR ENERGY & ENVIRONMENT EXPO (MEE @ YgTF 2017, 24-26Feb): Myanmar Oil & Gas Expo, Myanmar Mining Expo, Myanmar Electricity Expo, Myanmar Environment Expo

MiTA is uniquely well placed to assist and support foreign organizations in following up on investment and business opportunities that will ensue from these conferences and exhibitions in Myanmar.

— www.digitalmarketing.ink

WASHINGTON DC & YANGON, USA & MYANMAR, December 10, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — MiTA "Myanmar Oil & Gas Exhibition" is organized by MiTA "Myanmar Market Partner" for Export-Import and JV-Investment since 2009.

MiTA Myanmar Oil and Gas Expo is the Great Market Platforms to initiate & grow Oil and Gas Business in Myanmar. Supported by a promise to help you find Myanmar Distributors, Myanmar Oil & Gas Companies, Myanmar Oil & Gas Operators, Myanmar Energy Companies & JV-Investment Partners, network with Investors in Myanmar; and know "how to do business in Myanmar oil and gas, energy and environment sectors".

EU Ambassador, Harvard Business School (HBS) and Singapore International Arbitration Center (SIAC) will also present along with UMFCCI and Myanmar Government Ministry officials during YgTF 2017. MiTA Myanmar Exhibitions and Conferences which were held in 2015 & 2016 were grand success.

MYANMAR OIL & GAS CONFERENCE AND EXHIBITION, website: http://myanmar-oil-and-gas-expo.mitamyanmar.com

SUPPORTING-ORGANIZATIONS:
– HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL
– SIAC-SINGAPORE
– Department for International Trade (UK), Myanmar Office
– A-MCC (Australia-Myanmar Chamber of Commerce)
– Mandalay Region Chamber of Commerce and Industry

BROCHURE: Please email (thazin@mitaservices.com.sg, mhc1@mita-myanmar.com) for:
– Price-List,
– MYANMAR CONFERENCE Agenda,
– Expo & Conference Hall-Layout,
– Expo-Booth-Facilities and
– Experience (Recommendation) in last Expo

PRICE till 6 January 2017; price increases from 7Jan2017
USD 3100 per 9 SQM (3mx3m) with standard-booth-facilities
USD 500 per Conference-Delegate with networking lunch & tea-coffee breaks
Trade-Visitors: Entry-to-Exhibition is Free.

MYANMAR OIL & GAS EXPO – Exhibit Profiles:
– Geophysical / Seismic Survey and Equipment
– Oil-Field Equipment
– Refinery Technology & Equipment
– Petrochemicals Equipment
– Storage Equipment & Tanks Fabrication
– FPSO
– Offshore Installation Vessels
– Safety and Security Equipment. & Systems
– Oil & Gas Pipelines: Pipeline Engineering, Pipeline Laying
– Onshore Fabrication
– Offshore Installation
– Well Control, Testing and Services
– Oil and Gas Drilling and Well Servicing
– Classification & Certification Services
– Engineering & Project Management Consultancy
– Reservoir Engineering and Evaluation
– ROVs, Diving and Cameras, etc.

MYANMAR OIL AND GAS EXPO will be held at the big expo venue in Yangon "Tatmadaw Hall" and will be part of Myanmar Energy & Environment Expo, MEE @ YgTF 2017.

We are organizing expo with multiple theme because:

– there will be better business matchmaking with Myanmar Companies; and
– majority of the private companies in Myanmar are family owned and they have multiple businesses.

Our expo will have concurrent "Myanmar Investment Conference" (which is value addition)which is entry-free; conference participants need to buy delegate tickets if they want to join B-2-B networking sessions.

Tatmadaw Hall expo & conference venue will be managed by Grand United Hotel (a 4 star hotel in Yangon); Grand United Hotel managed our past 2 exhibitions at Tatmadaw Hall.

Other events of MEE @ YgTF 2017, 24-26 Feb

Myanmar Electricity Expo: http://myanmar-electricity-power-expo.mitamyanmar.com
– Power Transmission & Control Technology
– Thermal-Power
– Coal-fired Power Plant
– Clean Coal Technology
– Control Transformer
– Engine Generators
– Power Transmission Products
– Hydropower Mechanical Equipment, etc.

Myanmar Renewable Energy Expo: http://myanmar-renewable-energy-expo.mitamyanmar.com
– Dam Construction Machinery
– Solar-Energy
– Wind-Energy
– Hydro-power
– Wind-Solar Hybrid Power System
– Biomass Energy: Waste to Energy
– Solar Water Heater
– Solar Energy Photo Voltaic (Solar-PV), etc.

Myanmar Environmental Expo: http://myanmar-environmental-engineering-expo.mitamyanmar.com
– Environmental Engineering Services,
– Smart-Buildings
– Waste Management
– Landfill Sites Management
– Organic Waste Processing
– Waste-to-Energy Technology
– Waste Disposal
– Waste Water Treatment, etc.

HOW TO JOIN MiTA MYANMAR EXPO?
Please email following information so that we can email you available booth-numbers and help you doing online-registration:
– Your contact address and phone-number
– Your company's Contact person name, position, phone-number, email-address, company-name and address for invoicing purposes
– How many exhibition-booths (each booth is 9 SQM)
– How many conference-delegate-tickets do you want to book?

TRADE-VISITORS: Entry-to-Exhibition is Free

REGISTRATION & PAYMENT:
Email: thazin@mitaservices.com.sg, mhc1@mita-myanmar.com
Phone: +95 9420 110 451, +95 9420 110 666

Dr. MADHAB PAUL, MANAGING DIRECTOR OF MiTA

www.madhabpaul.com

Dr. Madhab Paul, also speak about Opportunities in Myanmar in several international events. His recent speaking engagement was during "Russia & Asia Business Forum"; more info about the Forum: http://raibf.com/en/home-page/ . Dr. Paul traveled extensively in India, USA, Germany, China, Singapore, Vietnam, Philippine, Thailand and Myanmar, as well as, many other countries which he visited for business / work / pleasure for a short period. He did PhD in Civil (Geo-technical) Engineering and has post-graduate education in Law & Management; also did "Doing Business in Emerging Market" a short course from Harvard Business School (HBS). Please email to: isbc@mitaservices.com.sg if you wish to invite Dr. Madhab Paul to speak at your international conference / private investor's meeting.

ORGANIZER: MiTA

MiTA is Myanmar Market Partner for Export-Import and JV-Investment in Myanmar. MiTA Myanmar @ ISBC is preferred Partner for JV-Investment, Export-Import, Real Estate (www.mitaproperty.com) and Manufacturing since 2011. MiTA Services Pte Ltd (Singapore) is providing consulting for investment and trade in Myanmar since 2009. MiTA's one of the major initiatives now is making "Made-In-Myanmar" brand: www.1pya.com world famous!

MiTA: MYANMAR MARKET PARTNER Since 2009

Welcome you all to MYANMAR, the land of new OPPORTUNITIES!

www.digitalmarketing.ink

————–END————

DOING BUSINESS IN MYANMAR: Quick-Links

Advantages in Myanmar Trade-Investment: http://advantages-myanmar.com
Myanmar-Trade-Investment News: http://myanmarbusinessnews.mitamyanmar.com

http://myanmar-conferences-exhibitions-workshops.myanmarinvestmentbusiness.com

Myanmar Investment Commission & MIC-Permit: http://myanmarinvestmentbusiness.com/myanmar-investment-commission-mic-permit-company-registration-dica-directorate-of-investment-and-company-administration/
Company Registration in Myanmar: https://mitaservices.com.sg/services/company-incorporation-in-myanmar/foreign-investment-mic-permit-dica-registration/

IEE-EIA-HIA-SIA-CSR in Myanmar: https://mitaservices.com.sg/services/eia-sia-csr-consulting/
Techno-Commercial Due-Diligence in Myanmar: https://mitaservices.com.sg/services/due-diligence-consulting/

JOBS-Recruitment: http://mitajobs.com

Insurance: http://yangoninsuranceagency.com

Property Marketing in Myanmar: http://mitaproperty.com

Myanmar Construction-Property-Furniture Expo: 24-26Feb2017:

http://myanmar-property-expo.mitamyanmar.com

http://myanmar-construction-equipment-building-materials-expo.mitamyanmar.com

http://myanmar-furniture-handicrafts-expo.mitamyanmar.com

http://myanmar-architecture-expo.mitamyanmar.com

Myanmar Water Expo & Myanmar Home Expo: 23-25June2017:

http://myanmar-water-environment-expo.mitaproperty.com

http://myanmar-furniture-expo.mitaproperty.com

http://myanmar-real-estate-expo.mitaproperty.com

http://myanmar-interior-decoration-expo.mitaproperty.com

http://myanmar-home-equipment-expo.mitaproperty.com

http://satprnews.com/2016/12/04/myanmar-water-news-myanmar-water-exhibition-in-yangon-expo-by-mita-24-26feb-23-25-feb-2017/

Myanmar Healthcare:

MHC–June

http://myanmar-medical-expo.mitamyanmar.com
http://pharmaceuticals-exhibition.mitamyanmar.com
http://beauty-cosmetics-fashion.mitamyanmar.com
http://clinics-hospitals.mitamyanmar.com

MHC@YgTF Feb

http://myanmar-medical-lab-expo.brand-myanmar.com
http://myanmar-cosmetics-beauty-expo.brand-myanmar.com
http://myanmar-pharma-expo.brand-myanmar.com

Myanmar Food:
http://myanmar-agriculture-expo.mitamyanmar.com
http://myanmar-food-processing-expo.mitamyanmar.com
http://myanmar-fisheries-aquaculture-expo.mitamyanmar.com

Myanmar Oil & Gas Exploration, Charter-Hire Offshore Vessels, Fabrication & Installation: https://mitaservices.com.sg/clients-projects-of-mita/

Electricity: http://myanmar-electricity-power-expo.mitamyanmar.com
Environment: http://myanmar-environmental-engineering-expo.mitamyanmar.com
Solar-Energy: http://myanmar-renewable-energy-expo.mitamyanmar.com

Mining: http://myanmar-mining-expo.mitamyanmar.com

Manufacturing "Made-In-Myanmar" Brand: http://1pya.com

Mandalay GREAT Trade Fair, MgTF-2017: http://mandalay-business.expo-mita.com

PR-Liaison-Branding in Myanmar: http://brand-myanmar.com
DIGITAL-MARKETING & GLOBAL-BRANDING: www.digitalmarketing.ink

"Myanmar Oil & Gas and Energy Exhibition" News @ JETRO, Japan
Energy: https://www.jetro.go.jp/j-messe/tradefair_en/MYANMARENERGY_54262
Mining: https://www.jetro.go.jp/j-messe/tradefair_en/MyanmarMining_54259
Environment: http://www.jetro.go.jp/j-messe/tradefair_en/MyanmarEnvironmental_54256
Oil & Gas: http://www.jetro.go.jp/j-messe/tradefair_en/MiTAMyanmar_54260

Myanmar Oil & Gas Exhibition and Conference @ YgTF 2017, February 24-26
Event-updates, please visit: http://myanmar-oil-and-gas-expo.mitamyanmar.com and contact Organizer.

MiTA DIGITAL MARKETING INK http://digitalmarketing.ink
MiTA Services Pte Ltd
00959420110451
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire

Cannabis Consulting Firm Quantum 9 voted Best Management Consulting Firm in the US by Corporate Visions Magazine

Corporate Visions Cannabis Consulting

Best International Consulting Firm

Best International Cannabis Consulting Firm Corp Visions

Quantum 9 Voted Best Management Consulting Firm in the US

CHICAGO, IL, U.S.A., December 9, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — Quantum 9, Inc. an United States-based international cannabis consulting firm has been voted the Best International Marijuana Consulting Firm in the US by international magazine Corporate Visions Magazine. Corporate Vision (CV) has a vast network of industry insiders and corporate specialists dedicated to finding the best performing brightest, and most deserving companies from around the business world. Winners are decided by a combination of votes gathered from their network of respected industry partners and in-house research team. Each award is carefully scrutinized including the commitment to innovation, methods, and performance. The CV staff reviews each nomination including a competition review to ensure that only the most deserving companies for a vote.

About Quantum 9, Inc.
Quantum 9, Inc. is a Chicago, IL-based cannabis consulting firm. We specialize in winning cannabis business licenses for high net worth individuals, private equity, and investment firms to cultivate, manufacture and dispense marijuana. Our areas of expertise include permit acquisition, team building, employee training planning and optimization process planning. We help clients fully maximize the potential of any cannabis cultivation, processing and dispensary business.

Our team includes some of the most talented marijuana consultants in the world including award winning cannabis cultivators, scientists, and business owners. Our team holds advanced degrees in medicine, business, agriculture, horticulture and plant sciences. Our team will make any cannabis application submission for licensing stronger.

About Corporate Visions
Created by a highly experienced and passionate team of business experts, advisors, and insiders, Corporate Vision provides discerning readers worldwide with a wealth of news, features and comment on the corporate issues of the day.
Taking on everything from business strategy, expert opinion, analysis, corporate case studies, emerging trends, leadership, growth opportunities, and the challenges facing our country’s foremost business leaders, Corporate Vision is an invaluable resource for leaders and decision makers looking, not only to be informed, but to improve the way they manage their operations, staff, technology, business partnerships, and supply chains with a view to creating a more profitable and successful business.

Kevin Mahoney
Quantum 9, Inc.
888-716-0404
email us here

International Hemp and Cannabis Consulting


Source: EIN Presswire

Global GNSS Market 2016 Share, Trend, Segmentation and Forecast to 2022

GNSS -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021

PUNE, MAHARASHTRA, INDIA, December 9, 2016 /EINPresswire.com/ — GNSS Industry

Description

Wiseguyreports.Com Adds “GNSS -Market Demand, Growth, Opportunities and analysis of Top Key Player Forecast to 2021” To Its Research Database

The Global GNSS Consumption 2016 Market Research Report is a professional and in-depth study on the current state of the GNSS market.

First, the report provides a basic overview of the GNSS industry including definitions, classifications, applications and industry chain structure. And development policies and plans are discussed as well as manufacturing processes and cost structures.

Request for Sample Report @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/sample-request/494292-global-gnss-consumption-2016-market-research-report

Secondly, the report states the global GNSS market size (volume and value), and the segment markets by regions, types, applications and companies are also discussed.

Third, the GNSS market analysis is provided for major regions including USA, Europe, China and Japan, and other regions can be added. For each region, market size and end users are analyzed as well as segment markets by types, applications and companies.

Then, the report focuses on global major leading industry players with information such as company profiles, product picture and specifications, sales, market share and contact information. What’s more, the GNSS industry development trends and marketing channels are analyzed.

Finally, the feasibility of new investment projects is assessed, and overall research conclusions are offered.

In a word, the report provides major statistics on the state of the industry and is a valuable source of guidance and direction for companies and individuals interested in the market.

Leave a Query @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/enquiry/494292-global-gnss-consumption-2016-market-research-report

Table of Contents

1 Industry Overview of GNSS
1.1 Definition and Specifications of GNSS
1.1.1 Definition of GNSS
1.1.2 Specifications of GNSS
1.2 Classification of GNSS
1.3 Applications of GNSS
1.4 Industry Chain Structure of GNSS
1.5 Industry Overview and Major Regions Status of GNSS
1.5.1 Industry Overview of GNSS
1.5.2 Global Major Regions Status of GNSS
1.6 Industry Policy Analysis of GNSS
1.7 Industry News Analysis of GNSS

2 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis of GNSS
2.1 Raw Material Suppliers and Price Analysis of GNSS
2.2 Equipment Suppliers and Price Analysis of GNSS
2.3 Labor Cost Analysis of GNSS
2.4 Other Costs Analysis of GNSS
2.5 Manufacturing Cost Structure Analysis of GNSS
2.6 Manufacturing Process Analysis of GNSS

….

8 Major Manufacturers Analysis of GNSS
8.1 Qualcomm
8.1.1 Company Profile
8.1.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.1.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.1.4 Contact Information

8.2 Trimble Navigation
8.2.1 Company Profile
8.2.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.2.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.2.4 Contact Information

8.3 Broadcom
8.3.1 Company Profile
8.3.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.3.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.3.4 Contact Information

8.4 CSR (Qualcomm)
8.4.1 Company Profile
8.4.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.4.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.4.4 Contact Information

8.5 Laird PLC
8.5.1 Company Profile
8.5.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.5.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.5.4 Contact Information

8.6 Furuno Electric
8.6.1 Company Profile
8.6.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.6.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.6.4 Contact Information

8.7 Rockwell Collins
8.7.1 Company Profile
8.7.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.7.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.7.4 Contact Information

8.8 Texas Instruments
8.8.1 Company Profile
8.8.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.8.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.8.4 Contact Information

8.9 Cobham
8.9.1 Company Profile
8.9.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.9.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.9.4 Contact Information

8.10 Hexagon
8.10.1 Company Profile
8.10.2 Product Picture and Specifications
8.10.3 Sales Volume, Sales Revenue, Sale Price and Gross Margin
8.10.4 Contact Information

Buy now @ https://www.wiseguyreports.com/checkout?currency=one_user-USD&report_id=494292

Continued…

Contact Us: Sales@Wiseguyreports.Com Ph: +1-646-845-9349 (US) Ph: +44 208 133 9349 (UK)

Norah Trent
wiseguyreports
+1 646 845 9349 / +44 208 133 9349
email us here


Source: EIN Presswire